mirror of
https://github.com/ChronosX88/netsukuku.git
synced 2024-11-30 06:02:18 +00:00
131 lines
5.4 KiB
Plaintext
131 lines
5.4 KiB
Plaintext
== NTK_RFC 0003 ==
|
|
|
|
Subject: Internet Gateway Search
|
|
|
|
----
|
|
This text describes a change to the Npv7.
|
|
It will be included in the final documentation, so feel free to correct it.
|
|
But if you want to change the system here described, please contact us first.
|
|
----
|
|
|
|
If the nodes are in restricted mode (compatibility with the Internet), they
|
|
should share their Internet connection. This can be easily done, in fact, if
|
|
a node X, connected to the Internet, activates the masquerading, it is
|
|
possible for the other nodes to connect by setting as the default gateway
|
|
their rnode which lead to the node X.
|
|
|
|
This can be automated by Netsukuku itself and it requires small changes in the
|
|
code: it is just necessary that the nodes connected to the Internet set a flag
|
|
in the qspn_pkt, in this way the other nodes will know the routes to reach the
|
|
Internet.
|
|
|
|
=== Multi-gateways ===
|
|
|
|
The situation becomes a little complex when there is more than one node which
|
|
shares its internet connection. Let's consider this scenario:
|
|
|
|
{{{
|
|
A(gw) B(gw)
|
|
\ /
|
|
\___ ___/
|
|
\/
|
|
Ntk nodes (10.x.x.x)
|
|
}}}
|
|
|
|
A and B are nodes which shares their internet connection, we call them
|
|
gateways. Let's call X the node which wants to connect to an Internet host.
|
|
In this case, the nodes near A, might find useful to use A itself to
|
|
reach the Internet, the same happens for the nodes near B.
|
|
Instead, the nodes in the middle don't know what is the best choice and they
|
|
might continuosly change their gw. This means that a tcp connection
|
|
(to an inet host), which was established trough A, when is then routed trough
|
|
B dies because A and B have different public IPs on the Internet.
|
|
|
|
The node X has to create an IPIP tunnel to the gateway it wants to use, and
|
|
set as default gw the tunnel. In this way, the node X is sure to always use
|
|
the same gateway while the routing of the packets between it and the gw is
|
|
made transparently by the other Netsukuku nodes.
|
|
|
|
==== Anti loop multi-inet_gw shield ====
|
|
|
|
An inet-gw is a normal node like all the other, therefore it can use the
|
|
Internet connections of the other inet-gws in conjunction with its own one.
|
|
|
|
Consider the previous scenario, A and B are two inet-gw.
|
|
A sets in his internet default route the adsl modem and B.
|
|
B does the same, but sets A as the second default route.
|
|
|
|
What would happen if the default route, written in the routing cache of A, is
|
|
B and, at the same time, the default route set in the routing cache of B is A?
|
|
The packets would jump endlessy in a infinite loop loosing themself forever.
|
|
|
|
That's why we need the "anti loop multi-inet_gw shield".
|
|
It's working way is simple: each inet-gw has a netfilter rule which marks
|
|
all the packets coming from the outside and directed to the Internet. These
|
|
packets are then routed directly to the Internet without being sent, again, to
|
|
an inet-gw. In the example:
|
|
A wants to send a packet to the Internet and its looks in its routing cache.
|
|
It decide to forward the packet to B. B receives the packet, recognizes it is
|
|
an extern packet directed to the Internet and shoots it on its modem.
|
|
|
|
=== Load sharing ===
|
|
|
|
Let's consider the previous scenario.
|
|
|
|
The node X can also decide to use both A and B to reach the Internet, using
|
|
at the same time their connections! Even the gw A can use at the same time
|
|
its own line and the connection of the gw B.
|
|
|
|
The procedure to implement this is what follows:
|
|
|
|
* X creates a tunnel to A and another one to B
|
|
|
|
* X adds in the routing table the default route using A and B as multipath
|
|
gateways. The gateway for the connections is chosen randomly.
|
|
|
|
* X adds a rule in the routing table to route all the packets of established
|
|
connections trough the same gateway used to create the same connection.
|
|
The rule is linked to some netfilter rules which track and mark each
|
|
connection. The method is described in details here:
|
|
https://lists.netfilter.org/pipermail/netfilter/2006-March/065005.html
|
|
|
|
=== The bad ===
|
|
|
|
The implementation of the Load sharing is very Linux specific, so it will be
|
|
very difficult to port it to other kernels, therefore this feature will be
|
|
available only to nodes which run Linux (ehi, one more reason to use Linux ;).
|
|
|
|
=== MASQUERADING ===
|
|
|
|
Each node sharing the Internet connection (inet-gw) has to masquerade its
|
|
interfaces, so iptables must be used.
|
|
In order to keep the daemon portable, NetsukukuD will launch the script found
|
|
at /etc/netsukuku/masquerade.sh, which in Linux will be a simple script that
|
|
executes "iptables -A POSTROUTING -t nat -j MASQUERADE".
|
|
When NetsukukuD is closed the added firewall rules are flushed with
|
|
"/etc/netsukuku/masquerade.sh close"
|
|
|
|
|
|
=== Traffic shaping ===
|
|
|
|
The inet-gw can also shape its internet connection in order to prioritize its
|
|
local outgoing traffic (the traffic coming from its 192.168.x.x LAN).
|
|
In this way, even if it shares its Internet connection, it won't notice any
|
|
difference 'cause it will have the first priority. Moreover with the traffic
|
|
shaper, the inet-gw can also prioritize some protocol, i.e. SSH.
|
|
|
|
The traffic shaper will activated at the start of NetsukukuD. The daemon will
|
|
run the /etc/netsukuku/tc_shaper.sh script, which in Linux utilizes the
|
|
iproute2 userspace utility.
|
|
When the daemon is closed the traffic shaping will be disabled with
|
|
"/etc/netsukuku/tc_shaper.sh close".
|
|
|
|
=== See also ===
|
|
|
|
For more information on the necessity of using ipip tunnels in an adhoc
|
|
network used to share internet connections, you can read this paper:
|
|
http://www.olsr.org/docs/XA-OLSR-paper-for-ICC04.pdf
|
|
|
|
----
|
|
related: ["Netsukuku RFC"]
|