mirror of
https://github.com/ChronosX88/psyced.git
synced 2024-11-08 11:31:01 +00:00
paying more attention to TLS
This commit is contained in:
parent
0c482f5104
commit
da6ce92529
2
.gitmodules
vendored
2
.gitmodules
vendored
@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
|
||||
[submodule "psyclpc"]
|
||||
path = psyclpc
|
||||
url = git://git.tgbit.net/psyclpc
|
||||
url = git://git.psyced.org/git/psyclpc
|
||||
|
@ -1,6 +1,15 @@
|
||||
<PSYC:TEXTDB> ## vim:syntax=mail
|
||||
## Check utf-8: Praise Atatürk!
|
||||
|
||||
_status_circuit_encryption_cipher
|
||||
|Gratuliere! Deine Verbindung ist mit Folgenlosigkeit verschlüsselt.
|
||||
|
||||
_warning_circuit_encryption_cipher
|
||||
|Deine Verbindung ist leider ohne Folgenlosigkeit verschlüsselt.
|
||||
|
||||
_error_circuit_encryption_cipher
|
||||
|Deine Verbindung ist ohne Folgenlosigkeit verschlüsselt.
|
||||
|
||||
_failure_disabled_function_register
|
||||
|Registrierung ist auf diesem Server deaktiviert.
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -1,6 +1,15 @@
|
||||
<PSYC:TEXTDB> ## vim:syntax=mail
|
||||
## Check utf-8: Praise Atatürk!
|
||||
|
||||
_status_circuit_encryption_cipher
|
||||
|Congratulations. Your connection is encrypted with forward secrecy.
|
||||
|
||||
_warning_circuit_encryption_cipher
|
||||
|Your cipher choice does not provide forward secrecy.
|
||||
|
||||
_error_circuit_encryption_cipher
|
||||
|Unfortunately your cipher choice does not provide forward secrecy.
|
||||
|
||||
_failure_disabled_function_register
|
||||
|Registration disabled on this server.
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -1,6 +1,15 @@
|
||||
<PSYC:TEXTDB> ## vim:syntax=mail
|
||||
## tradotto al 30% ... cerca /TODO/ per continuare
|
||||
|
||||
_status_circuit_encryption_cipher
|
||||
|Muy bueno! La tua connessione è crittata senza conseguenze.
|
||||
|
||||
_warning_circuit_encryption_cipher
|
||||
|La tua connessione non è crittata senza conseguenze.
|
||||
|
||||
_error_circuit_encryption_cipher
|
||||
|Purtroppo la tua connessione non è crittata senza conseguenze.
|
||||
|
||||
_failure_disabled_function_register
|
||||
|Registrazione di nuovi utenti disabilitata su questo server.
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ tls_logon(result) {
|
||||
mixed cert = tls_certificate(ME, 0);
|
||||
P3(("active::certinfo %O\n", cert))
|
||||
if (mappingp(cert)) {
|
||||
unless (certificate_check_name(hostname, cert, "xmpp-server")) {
|
||||
unless (tls_check_certificate_data(cert, hostname, "xmpp-server")) {
|
||||
#ifdef _flag_report_bogus_certificates
|
||||
monitor_report("_error_invalid_certificate_identity",
|
||||
sprintf("%O presented a certificate that "
|
||||
|
@ -393,7 +393,8 @@ xmpp_error(node, xmpperror) {
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// deprecated - use certificate_check_name from library/tls.c instead
|
||||
// deprecated - use tls_check_certificate_data from library/tls.c instead
|
||||
// is this being used at all?
|
||||
#ifdef WANT_S2S_TLS
|
||||
certificate_check_jabbername(name, cert) {
|
||||
mixed t;
|
||||
|
@ -291,7 +291,7 @@ jabberMsg(XMLNode node) {
|
||||
// paranoia note: as with XEP 0178 we might want to check dns anyway to
|
||||
// protect against stolen certificates
|
||||
if (mappingp(certinfo) && certinfo[0] == 0
|
||||
&& node["@from"] && certificate_check_name(node["@from"], certinfo, "xmpp-server")) {
|
||||
&& node["@from"] && tls_check_certificate_data(certinfo, node["@from"], "xmpp-server")) {
|
||||
P2(("dialback without dialback %O\n", certinfo))
|
||||
verify_connection(node["@to"], node["@from"], "valid");
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
@ -414,7 +414,7 @@ jabberMsg(XMLNode node) {
|
||||
*/
|
||||
int success = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
success = certificate_check_name(t, certinfo, "xmpp-server");
|
||||
success = tls_check_certificate_data(certinfo, t, "xmpp-server");
|
||||
if (success) {
|
||||
emitraw("<success xmlns='" NS_XMPP "xmpp-sasl'/>");
|
||||
P2(("successful sasl external authentication with "
|
||||
@ -542,8 +542,8 @@ open_stream(XMLNode node) {
|
||||
// sasl external if we know that it will succeed
|
||||
// later on
|
||||
if (node["@from"] &&
|
||||
certificate_check_name(node["@from"],
|
||||
certinfo, "xmpp-server")) {
|
||||
tls_check_certificate_data(certinfo, node["@from"],
|
||||
"xmpp-server")) {
|
||||
packet += "<mechanisms xmlns='" NS_XMPP "xmpp-sasl'>";
|
||||
packet += "<mechanism>EXTERNAL</mechanism>";
|
||||
packet += "</mechanisms>";
|
||||
|
@ -490,6 +490,7 @@ open_stream(XMLNode node) {
|
||||
#if __EFUN_DEFINED__(tls_available)
|
||||
if (tls_available() && tls_query_connection_state(ME) > 0
|
||||
&& mappingp(certinfo) && certinfo[0] == 0
|
||||
// why do we use the old one here?
|
||||
&& certificate_check_jabbername(0, certinfo)) {
|
||||
features += "<mechanism>EXTERNAL</mechanism>";
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -1,4 +1,7 @@
|
||||
#include <net.h> // vim syntax=lpc
|
||||
#include <proto.h>
|
||||
#include <sys/tls.h>
|
||||
|
||||
mapping tls_certificate(object who, int longnames) {
|
||||
mixed *extra, extensions;
|
||||
mapping cert;
|
||||
@ -85,7 +88,7 @@ mapping tls_certificate(object who, int longnames) {
|
||||
|
||||
// generalized variant of the old certificate_check_jabbername
|
||||
// RFC 6125 describes the process in more detail
|
||||
int certificate_check_name(string name, mixed cert, string scheme) {
|
||||
int tls_check_certificate_data(mixed cert, string name, string scheme) {
|
||||
mixed t;
|
||||
string idn;
|
||||
// FIXME: should probably be more careful about internationalized
|
||||
@ -159,3 +162,20 @@ int certificate_check_name(string name, mixed cert, string scheme) {
|
||||
}
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
int tls_check_cipher(object sock, string scheme) {
|
||||
string t;
|
||||
mixed m = tls_query_connection_info(sock);
|
||||
|
||||
P3(("%O is using the %O cipher.\n", sock, m[TLS_CIPHER]))
|
||||
// shouldn't our negotiation have ensured we have PFS?
|
||||
|
||||
if (stringp(t = m[TLS_CIPHER]) &&! abbrev("DHE", t)) {
|
||||
monitor_report("_warning_circuit_encryption_cipher_details",
|
||||
object_name(sock) +" · using "+ t +" cipher");
|
||||
// we can't expect that degree of privacy from jabber, for now
|
||||
if (scheme != "xmpp") return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
return 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -209,48 +209,41 @@ int logon(int neverfails) {
|
||||
|
||||
#ifdef __TLS__
|
||||
sAuthHosts(([ ])); // reset authhosts
|
||||
if (tls_available() && tls_query_connection_state(ME) == 1 && mappingp(cert = tls_certificate(ME, 0))) {
|
||||
if (cert[0] != 0) {
|
||||
// log error 17 or 18 + cert here
|
||||
P0(("%O encountered a cert verify error %O in %O\n", ME,
|
||||
cert[0], cert))
|
||||
// and goodbye.
|
||||
if (tls_available() && tls_query_connection_state(ME) == 1) {
|
||||
unless (tls_check_cipher(ME, "psyc")) {
|
||||
croak("_error_circuit_encryption_cipher",
|
||||
"Your cipher choice does not provide forward secrecy.");
|
||||
QUIT
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (mappingp(cert = tls_certificate(ME, 0))) {
|
||||
if (cert[0] != 0) {
|
||||
// log error 17 or 18 + cert here
|
||||
P0(("%O encountered a cert verify error %O in %O\n", ME,
|
||||
cert[0], cert))
|
||||
// and goodbye.
|
||||
# ifdef _flag_enable_certificate_any
|
||||
remove_interactive(ME);
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
remove_interactive(ME);
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
# endif
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (m = cert["2.5.29.17:dNSName"]) {
|
||||
// FIXME: this does not yet handle wildcard DNS names
|
||||
P1(("%O believing dNSName %O\n", ME, m))
|
||||
// probably also: register_target?
|
||||
// but be careful never to register_target wildcards
|
||||
if (stringp(m)) sAuthenticated(m);
|
||||
else foreach(t : m) sAuthenticated(t);
|
||||
}
|
||||
//#ifdef _flag_allow_certificate_name_common // to be switched this year
|
||||
# ifndef _flag_disallow_certificate_name_common
|
||||
// assume that CN is a host
|
||||
// as this is an assumption only, we may NEVER register_target it
|
||||
// note: CN is deprecated for good reasons.
|
||||
else if (t = cert["2.5.4.3"]) {
|
||||
P1(("%O believing CN %O\n", ME, t))
|
||||
sAuthenticated(t);
|
||||
}
|
||||
# endif
|
||||
if (m = tls_query_connection_info(ME)) {
|
||||
P2(("%O is using the %O cipher.\n", ME, m[TLS_CIPHER]))
|
||||
// shouldn't our negotiation have ensured we have PFS?
|
||||
if (stringp(t = m[TLS_CIPHER]) &&! abbrev("DHE", t)) {
|
||||
// croak("_warning_circuit_encryption_cipher",
|
||||
// "Your cipher choice does not provide forward secrecy.");
|
||||
monitor_report(
|
||||
"_warning_circuit_encryption_cipher_details",
|
||||
object_name(ME) +" · using "+ t +" cipher");
|
||||
//debug_message(sprintf(
|
||||
// "TLS connection info for %O is %O\n", ME, m));
|
||||
//QUIT // are we ready for *this* !???
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (m = cert["2.5.29.17:dNSName"]) {
|
||||
// FIXME: this does not yet handle wildcard DNS names
|
||||
P1(("%O believing dNSName %O\n", ME, m))
|
||||
// probably also: register_target?
|
||||
// but be careful never to register_target wildcards
|
||||
if (stringp(m)) sAuthenticated(m);
|
||||
else foreach(t : m) sAuthenticated(t);
|
||||
}
|
||||
//#ifdef _flag_allow_certificate_name_common // to be switched this year
|
||||
# ifndef _flag_disallow_certificate_name_common
|
||||
// assume that CN is a host
|
||||
// as this is an assumption only, we may NEVER register_target it
|
||||
// note: CN is deprecated for good reasons.
|
||||
else if (t = cert["2.5.4.3"]) {
|
||||
P1(("%O believing CN %O\n", ME, t))
|
||||
sAuthenticated(t);
|
||||
}
|
||||
# endif
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
@ -117,6 +117,12 @@ int logon(int failure) {
|
||||
} else if (tls_query_connection_state(ME) == 1) {
|
||||
certinfo = tls_certificate(ME, 0);
|
||||
P0(("certinfo: %O\n", certinfo))
|
||||
unless (tls_check_cipher(ME, "psyc")) {
|
||||
croak("_error_circuit_encryption_cipher",
|
||||
"Your cipher choice does not provide forward secrecy.");
|
||||
//destruct(ME);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
@ -207,7 +213,7 @@ void circuit_msg(string mc, mapping vars, string data) {
|
||||
} else if (tls_query_connection_state(ME) == 1
|
||||
&& mappingp(certinfo)
|
||||
&& certinfo[0] == 0
|
||||
&& certificate_check_name(su[UHost], certinfo, "psyc") == 1) {
|
||||
&& tls_check_certificate_data(certinfo, su[UHost], "psyc") == 1) {
|
||||
sAuthenticated(su[UHost]);
|
||||
if (flags & TCP_PENDING_TIMEOUT) {
|
||||
P0(("removing call out\n"))
|
||||
|
@ -1555,6 +1555,16 @@ logon() {
|
||||
return remove_interactive(ME);
|
||||
// and the object will deteriorate when user gives up..
|
||||
}
|
||||
#ifdef __TLS__
|
||||
if (tls_query_connection_state(ME) == 1) {
|
||||
if (tls_check_cipher(ME, v("scheme"))) {
|
||||
w("_status_circuit_encryption_cipher");
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
w("_warning_circuit_encryption_cipher");
|
||||
//return remove_interactive(ME);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
// shouldn't this be qScheme() instead? little paranoid TODO
|
||||
// but then we would have to move qScheme() from the server.c's
|
||||
// into the common.c's .. well, we could do that some day
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user