paying more attention to TLS

.gitmodules

@@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
 [submodule "psyclpc"]
 	path = psyclpc
-	url = git://git.tgbit.net/psyclpc
+	url = git://git.psyced.org/git/psyclpc

world/default/de/plain.textdb

@@ -1,6 +1,15 @@
 <PSYC:TEXTDB> ## vim:syntax=mail
 ## Check utf-8: Praise Atatürk!
 
+_status_circuit_encryption_cipher
+|Gratuliere! Deine Verbindung ist mit Folgenlosigkeit verschlüsselt.
+
+_warning_circuit_encryption_cipher
+|Deine Verbindung ist leider ohne Folgenlosigkeit verschlüsselt.
+
+_error_circuit_encryption_cipher
+|Deine Verbindung ist ohne Folgenlosigkeit verschlüsselt.
+
 _failure_disabled_function_register
 |Registrierung ist auf diesem Server deaktiviert.
 

world/default/en/plain.textdb

@@ -1,6 +1,15 @@
 <PSYC:TEXTDB> ## vim:syntax=mail
 ## Check utf-8: Praise Atatürk!
 
+_status_circuit_encryption_cipher
+|Congratulations. Your connection is encrypted with forward secrecy.
+
+_warning_circuit_encryption_cipher
+|Your cipher choice does not provide forward secrecy.
+
+_error_circuit_encryption_cipher
+|Unfortunately your cipher choice does not provide forward secrecy.
+
 _failure_disabled_function_register
 |Registration disabled on this server.
 

world/default/it/plain.textdb

@@ -1,6 +1,15 @@
 <PSYC:TEXTDB> ## vim:syntax=mail
 ## tradotto al 30% ... cerca /TODO/ per continuare
 
+_status_circuit_encryption_cipher
+|Muy bueno! La tua connessione è crittata senza conseguenze.
+
+_warning_circuit_encryption_cipher
+|La tua connessione non è crittata senza conseguenze.
+
+_error_circuit_encryption_cipher
+|Purtroppo la tua connessione non è crittata senza conseguenze.
+
 _failure_disabled_function_register
 |Registrazione di nuovi utenti disabilitata su questo server.
 

world/net/jabber/active.c

@@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ tls_logon(result) {
 	mixed cert = tls_certificate(ME, 0);
 	P3(("active::certinfo %O\n", cert))
 	if (mappingp(cert)) {
-	    unless (certificate_check_name(hostname, cert, "xmpp-server")) {
+	    unless (tls_check_certificate_data(cert, hostname, "xmpp-server")) {
 #ifdef _flag_report_bogus_certificates
 		monitor_report("_error_invalid_certificate_identity",
 			       sprintf("%O presented a certificate that "

world/net/jabber/common.c

@@ -393,7 +393,8 @@ xmpp_error(node, xmpperror) {
     return 0;
 }
 
-// deprecated - use certificate_check_name from library/tls.c instead
+// deprecated - use tls_check_certificate_data from library/tls.c instead
+// is this being used at all?
 #ifdef WANT_S2S_TLS
 certificate_check_jabbername(name, cert) {
     mixed t;

world/net/jabber/gateway.c

@@ -291,7 +291,7 @@ jabberMsg(XMLNode node) {
 	// paranoia note: as with XEP 0178 we might want to check dns anyway to
 	// 	protect against stolen certificates
 	if (mappingp(certinfo) && certinfo[0] == 0 
-	    && node["@from"] && certificate_check_name(node["@from"], certinfo, "xmpp-server")) {
+	    && node["@from"] && tls_check_certificate_data(certinfo, node["@from"], "xmpp-server")) {
 		P2(("dialback without dialback %O\n", certinfo))
 		verify_connection(node["@to"], node["@from"], "valid"); 
 	} else {
@@ -414,7 +414,7 @@ jabberMsg(XMLNode node) {
 		 */
 		int success = 0;
 
-		success = certificate_check_name(t, certinfo, "xmpp-server");
+		success = tls_check_certificate_data(certinfo, t, "xmpp-server");
 		if (success) {
 		    emitraw("<success xmlns='" NS_XMPP "xmpp-sasl'/>");
 		    P2(("successful sasl external authentication with "
@@ -542,8 +542,8 @@ open_stream(XMLNode node) {
 		    // sasl external if we know that it will succeed
 		    // later on
 		    if (node["@from"] &&
-			    certificate_check_name(node["@from"],
+			    tls_check_certificate_data(certinfo, node["@from"],
-						     certinfo, "xmpp-server")) {
+						     "xmpp-server")) {
 			packet += "<mechanisms xmlns='" NS_XMPP "xmpp-sasl'>";
 			packet += "<mechanism>EXTERNAL</mechanism>";
 			packet += "</mechanisms>";

world/net/jabber/server.c

@@ -490,6 +490,7 @@ open_stream(XMLNode node) {
 #if __EFUN_DEFINED__(tls_available)
 		if (tls_available() && tls_query_connection_state(ME) > 0
 			&& mappingp(certinfo) && certinfo[0] == 0
+			// why do we use the old one here?
 			&& certificate_check_jabbername(0, certinfo)) {
 		    features += "<mechanism>EXTERNAL</mechanism>";
 		}

world/net/library/tls.c

@@ -1,4 +1,7 @@
 #include <net.h> // vim syntax=lpc
+#include <proto.h>
+#include <sys/tls.h>
+
 mapping tls_certificate(object who, int longnames) {
     mixed *extra, extensions;
     mapping cert;
@@ -85,7 +88,7 @@ mapping tls_certificate(object who, int longnames) {
 
 // generalized variant of the old certificate_check_jabbername
 // RFC 6125 describes the process in more detail
-int certificate_check_name(string name, mixed cert, string scheme) {
+int tls_check_certificate_data(mixed cert, string name, string scheme) {
     mixed t;
     string idn;
     // FIXME: should probably be more careful about internationalized
@@ -159,3 +162,20 @@ int certificate_check_name(string name, mixed cert, string scheme) {
     }
     return 0;
 }
+
+int tls_check_cipher(object sock, string scheme) {
+    string t;
+    mixed m = tls_query_connection_info(sock);
+
+    P3(("%O is using the %O cipher.\n", sock, m[TLS_CIPHER]))
+    // shouldn't our negotiation have ensured we have PFS?
+
+    if (stringp(t = m[TLS_CIPHER]) &&! abbrev("DHE", t)) {
+	monitor_report("_warning_circuit_encryption_cipher_details",
+	    object_name(sock) +" · using "+ t +" cipher");
+	// we can't expect that degree of privacy from jabber, for now
+	if (scheme != "xmpp") return 0;
+    }
+    return 1;
+}
+

world/net/psyc/circuit.c

@@ -209,7 +209,13 @@ int logon(int neverfails) {
 
 #ifdef __TLS__
 	sAuthHosts(([ ])); // reset authhosts 
-	if (tls_available() && tls_query_connection_state(ME) == 1 && mappingp(cert = tls_certificate(ME, 0))) {
+	if (tls_available() && tls_query_connection_state(ME) == 1) {
+	    unless (tls_check_cipher(ME, "psyc")) {
+		croak("_error_circuit_encryption_cipher",
+		  "Your cipher choice does not provide forward secrecy.");
+		QUIT
+	    }
+	    if (mappingp(cert = tls_certificate(ME, 0))) {
 		if (cert[0] != 0) {
 		    // log error 17 or 18 + cert here
 		    P0(("%O encountered a cert verify error %O in %O\n", ME,
@@ -238,19 +244,6 @@ int logon(int neverfails) {
 		    sAuthenticated(t);
 		}
 # endif
-	    if (m = tls_query_connection_info(ME)) {
-		P2(("%O is using the %O cipher.\n", ME, m[TLS_CIPHER]))
-		// shouldn't our negotiation have ensured we have PFS?
-		if (stringp(t = m[TLS_CIPHER]) &&! abbrev("DHE", t)) {
-//			croak("_warning_circuit_encryption_cipher",
-//			"Your cipher choice does not provide forward secrecy.");
-			monitor_report(
-			    "_warning_circuit_encryption_cipher_details",
-			    object_name(ME) +" · using "+ t +" cipher");
-			//debug_message(sprintf(
-			//  "TLS connection info for %O is %O\n", ME, m));
-			//QUIT	// are we ready for *this* !???
-		}
 	    }
 	}
 #endif

world/net/spyc/circuit.c

@@ -117,6 +117,12 @@ int logon(int failure) {
 	    } else if (tls_query_connection_state(ME) == 1) {
 		    certinfo = tls_certificate(ME, 0);
 		    P0(("certinfo: %O\n", certinfo))
+		    unless (tls_check_cipher(ME, "psyc")) {
+			    croak("_error_circuit_encryption_cipher",
+	      "Your cipher choice does not provide forward secrecy.");
+			    //destruct(ME);
+		    }
+
 	    }
     }
 #endif
@@ -207,7 +213,7 @@ void circuit_msg(string mc, mapping vars, string data) {
 	} else if (tls_query_connection_state(ME) == 1 
 		   && mappingp(certinfo)
 		   && certinfo[0] == 0
-		   && certificate_check_name(su[UHost], certinfo, "psyc") == 1) {
+		   && tls_check_certificate_data(certinfo, su[UHost], "psyc") == 1) {
 		sAuthenticated(su[UHost]);
 		if (flags & TCP_PENDING_TIMEOUT) {
 			P0(("removing call out\n"))

world/net/user.c

@@ -1555,6 +1555,16 @@ logon() {
 		return remove_interactive(ME);
 		// and the object will deteriorate when user gives up..
 	}
+#ifdef __TLS__
+	if (tls_query_connection_state(ME) == 1) {
+	    if (tls_check_cipher(ME, v("scheme"))) {
+                w("_status_circuit_encryption_cipher");
+	    } else {
+                w("_warning_circuit_encryption_cipher");
+		//return remove_interactive(ME);
+	    }
+	}
+#endif
 	// shouldn't this be qScheme() instead? little paranoid TODO
 	// but then we would have to move qScheme() from the server.c's
 	// into the common.c's .. well, we could do that some day